Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin has called on the government to release Bernard Antwi Boasiako, popularly known as Chairman Wontumi, while alleging that state institutions are targeting political opponents.
Speaking during a public address, Afenyo-Markin urged the government to “free Wontumi and all political prisoners now.” He also warned that the Minority would continue to scrutinise the administration’s actions.
The government has not accepted the Minority’s description of those in custody as “political prisoners.”
According to Afenyo-Markin, the treatment of Wontumi raises concerns about the use of state institutions in politically sensitive cases.
He argued that the rule of law should apply fairly to all citizens, regardless of political affiliation.
The Minority Leader said Parliament and the opposition would continue to demand accountability from the government.
Government officials have consistently rejected claims that investigations or prosecutions are politically motivated.
They maintain that investigative agencies and the courts perform their duties independently under Ghana’s Constitution.
Officials also say ongoing criminal investigations and court proceedings follow established legal processes.
Chairman Wontumi has faced investigations and legal proceedings involving state authorities. The matters remain subject to Ghana’s judicial process.
No court has concluded the outstanding legal issues at the centre of the current public debate. Legal experts have repeatedly stressed that ongoing cases should be determined through the courts.
The exchange reflects growing political disagreement over the handling of high-profile investigations. The Minority argues that opposition figures face unfair treatment.
The government rejects that position and insists that the law applies equally to everyone. Both sides continue to defend their positions through public statements and parliamentary debate.
Ghana’s Constitution guarantees the independence of the judiciary and due process for every person facing legal proceedings.
Legal observers say the courts remain the appropriate forum for determining criminal liability and resolving disputes.
Parliament is expected to continue debating governance and accountability issues as political parties prepare for future national contests.
